Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore

442 N.E.2d 71, 2 Ohio St. 3d 11

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 24, 1982·No. D.D. No. 82-23·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(l), DR 6-101(A)(3), and DR 7-101(A)(2).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(l), DR 6-101(A)(3), and DR 7-101(A)(2).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore, 442 N.E.2d 71, 2 Ohio St. 3d 11 (Ohio 1982).

Pincite

442 N.E.2d 71 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related