Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 21

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 21, 1962

DocketD. D. No. 32

StatusPublished

This text of 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 21 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Moore, 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 21 (Ohio 1962).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This court, from a careful examination of the record and a consideration of the course of conduct of the respondent, is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its findings or recommendation. Therefore, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Kerns, O’Neill and Griffith, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This court, from a careful examination of the record and a consideration of the course of conduct of the respondent, is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its findings or recommendation. Therefore, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Kerns, O’Neill and Griffith, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayton-bar-assn-v-moore-ohio-1962.