Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross

651 N.E.2d 1298, 73 Ohio St. 3d 1201, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 2682
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 22, 1995
DocketNo. 91-1251
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 651 N.E.2d 1298 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross, 651 N.E.2d 1298, 73 Ohio St. 3d 1201, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 2682 (Ohio 1995).

Opinion

[1202]*1202For earlier case, see Dayton Bar Assn. v. Gross (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 224, 581 N.E.2d 520.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas and Cook, JJ., would require petitioner to submit an agreement with his sister as a condition of his reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claudine L. Boyce, Also Known as Marilyn Boyce v. Vera Fernandes and City of Peoria, Illinois
77 F.3d 946 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 N.E.2d 1298, 73 Ohio St. 3d 1201, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 2682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayton-bar-assn-v-gross-ohio-1995.