Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison
552 N.E.2d 930, 50 Ohio St. 3d 131, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 153
Opinion
We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(3). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison, 552 N.E.2d 930, 50 Ohio St. 3d 131, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 153 (Ohio 1990).
552 N.E.2d 930 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison
118 Ohio St. 3d 128 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)