Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison

552 N.E.2d 930, 50 Ohio St. 3d 131, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 153
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 11, 1990·No. No. 89-2167·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(3). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison, 552 N.E.2d 930, 50 Ohio St. 3d 131, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 153 (Ohio 1990).

552 N.E.2d 930 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison
118 Ohio St. 3d 128 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)