Dayson v. Lanier

Fourth Circuit

Dayson v. Lanier

588 F. App'x 219

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2014·No. No. 14-2045·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Michael Dayson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dayson v. Lanier, No. 4:14-cv-00131-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2014). We deny Dayton’s motions to expedite the decision and to order an investigation of missing firearms. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Michael Dayson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dayson v. Lanier, No. 4:14-cv-00131-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2014). We deny Dayton’s motions to expedite the decision and to order an investigation of missing firearms. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Dayson v. Lanier, 588 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

588 F. App'x 219 (Dayson v. Lanier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related