Dayon v. Downe Communications, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Dayon v. Downe Communications, Inc.

345 N.E.2d 342, 38 N.Y.2d 795, 381 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2387

DecidedDecember 22, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 345 N.E.2d 342 (Dayon v. Downe Communications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dayon v. Downe Communications, Inc., 345 N.E.2d 342, 38 N.Y.2d 795, 381 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2387 (N.Y. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend this court’s order of dismissal dated June [796]*7967, 1973, considered as a motion for reconsideration of motion to dismiss the appeal, denied upon the ground it was not made promptly following entry of the order dismissing the appeal. An appellant whose appeal has been dismissed by this court and to whom some other method of taking an appeal is available except for time limitations in CPLR 5513 shall be deemed to have abandoned his appeal unless he: (1) makes timely use of CPLR 5514 (subd [a]), or (2) promptly seeks reconsideration by this court to enable this court to transfer the appeal pursuant to New York State Constitution (art VI, § 5, subd b). [See 32 NY2d 937.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend this court’s order of dismissal dated June [796]*7967, 1973, considered as a motion for reconsideration of motion to dismiss the appeal, denied upon the ground it was not made promptly following entry of the order dismissing the appeal. An appellant whose appeal has been dismissed by this court and to whom some other method of taking an appeal is available except for time limitations in CPLR 5513 shall be deemed to have abandoned his appeal unless he: (1) makes timely use of CPLR 5514 (subd [a]), or (2) promptly seeks reconsideration by this court to enable this court to transfer the appeal pursuant to New York State Constitution (art VI, § 5, subd b). [See 32 NY2d 937.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 N.E.2d 342, 38 N.Y.2d 795, 381 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayon-v-downe-communications-inc-ny-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack