Daylin Briggs v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 7, 2020·No. 05-19-01339-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered April 7, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-01310-CR No. 05-19-01339-CR

DAYLIN BRIGGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F18-39435-R & F19-75450-R

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 3, 2020 motion to supplement the record. In the motion, appellant states that the “smart player . . . included in Appellant’s copy of State’s Exhibit 4” does not work. We have reviewed the February 21, 2020 supplemental reporter’s record on file at the Court. It contains State’s Exhibit 4 and a smart player that plays all video clips that comprise State’s Exhibit 4. Therefore, we DENY appellant’s motion.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daylin Briggs v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Daylin Briggs v. State (Daylin Briggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.