Dayhuff v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dayhuff v. Brown

104 S.E. 29, 25 Ga. App. 633, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 113

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 17, 1920

Docket10411

StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E. 29 (Dayhuff v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dayhuff v. Brown, 104 S.E. 29, 25 Ga. App. 633, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 113 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the defendant’s plea in bar, and in thereafter sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition. See answers by tbe Supreme Court to certified questions propounded in this case. 150 Ga. 291 (103 S. E. 458).

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur. Westmoreland, Anderson & Smith, for plaintiff. Rosser, Slaton, Phillips & Hopkins, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the defendant’s plea in bar, and in thereafter sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition. See answers by tbe Supreme Court to certified questions propounded in this case. 150 Ga. 291 (103 S. E. 458).

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur. Westmoreland, Anderson & Smith, for plaintiff. Rosser, Slaton, Phillips & Hopkins, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 S.E. 29, 25 Ga. App. 633, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayhuff-v-brown-gactapp-1920.