Daye v. North Carolina Central University
This text of Daye v. North Carolina Central University (Daye v. North Carolina Central University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2. On May 1, 2007, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment with Deputy Commissioner Wanda Blanche Taylor.
3. On May 10, 2007, Deputy Commissioner Taylor, after a review of the record in this matter, issued an Order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
4. During the autumn of 2004, the plaintiff participated as a member of NCCU's football team. Following the completion of the season on November 20, 2004, the plaintiff and a group of friends played a "pick-up" game of tackle football on the field of O'Kelley-Reddick Stadium on NCCU's campus. No coaches, trainers, or other NCCU staff were present. The plaintiff and his friends were the only persons present on the field.
5. The plaintiff and his friends were not wearing any protective gear during the "pick-up" game. During the course of the game, the plaintiff suffered severe injuries after he attempted to tackle another individual. Following his injury, NCCU campus security and EMS *Page 3 personnel were summoned to the scene. After being taken from the field, and following the administration of medical care, it was determined that plaintiff's injury resulted in permanent partial paralysis.
6. Based upon the evidence of record, the Full Commission finds that there exists genuine issues as to the material facts in this matter including, but not limited to, whether a duty was owed by the defendant to the plaintiff and, if so, was such duty breached; whether a special relationship existed between the defendant and the plaintiff because the plaintiff was an NCCU athlete; and whether the plaintiff's actions constitute contributory negligence.
2. Based upon a careful review of the evidence of record in this case, the Full Commission finds that there exists genuine issues as to the material facts in this matter including, but not limited to, whether a duty was owed by the defendant to the plaintiff and, if so, was such duty breached; whether a special relationship existed between the defendant and the plaintiff because the plaintiff was an NCCU athlete; and whether the plaintiff's actions constitute contributory negligence. Because issues of material fact exist, the Full Commission concludes that summary judgment in this matter was improvidently granted by the Deputy Commissioner. N.C. Gen. Stat. §
2. This matter is hereby remanded to Deputy Commissioner Taylor for a full evidentiary hearing on the merits regarding the issues including, but not limited to, whether a duty was owed by the defendant to the plaintiff and, if so, was such duty breached; whether a special relationship existed between the defendant and the plaintiff because the plaintiff was an NCCU athlete; and whether the plaintiff's actions constitute contributory negligence.
3. Each party shall pay its own costs.
This 13th day of November 2007.
S/___________________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
*Page 1S/_____________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
S/_______________ BUCK LATTIMORE COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daye v. North Carolina Central University, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daye-v-north-carolina-central-university-ncworkcompcom-2007.