Daye v. McCoy

New York Court of Appeals

Daye v. McCoy

290 N.E.2d 824, 31 N.Y.2d 770, 338 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1021

DecidedNovember 2, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 290 N.E.2d 824 (Daye v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daye v. McCoy, 290 N.E.2d 824, 31 N.Y.2d 770, 338 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1021 (N.Y. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In first above-entitled proceeding: On the appeal by petitioner: Order affirmed, without costs. On the appeal by respondent: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that respondent is not aggrieved by the-modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 501, subd. [a], par. [iii] ; Barber & Bennett v. State of New York, 27 N Y 2d 738). No opinion.

In second above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitbl and Jasen. Chief Judge Fuld and Judge Gibson taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In first above-entitled proceeding: On the appeal by petitioner: Order affirmed, without costs. On the appeal by respondent: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that respondent is not aggrieved by the-modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 501, subd. [a], par. [iii] ; Barber & Bennett v. State of New York, 27 N Y 2d 738). No opinion.

In second above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitbl and Jasen. Chief Judge Fuld and Judge Gibson taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 N.E.2d 824, 31 N.Y.2d 770, 338 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daye-v-mccoy-ny-1972.