Dayco Corp. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 880
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of panels, sheets, and bars, made from and advanced beyond the stage of synthetic resin or resin-like products into finished panels, sheets, and bars of specific sizes and shapes dedicated to specific uses, similar to manufactures of india rubber, other, and following Hensel, Bruckmann Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 212, C.D. 2498), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dayco Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 880 (cusc 1967).
59 Cust. Ct. 880 (Dayco Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 212 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)