Dayco Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dayco Corp. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 880

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1967

DocketNo. P67/287

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 880 (Dayco Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dayco Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 880 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of panels, sheets, and bars, made from and advanced beyond the stage of synthetic resin or resin-like products into finished panels, sheets, and bars of specific sizes and shapes dedicated to specific uses, similar to manufactures of india rubber, other, and following Hensel, Bruckmann Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 212, C.D. 2498), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of panels, sheets, and bars, made from and advanced beyond the stage of synthetic resin or resin-like products into finished panels, sheets, and bars of specific sizes and shapes dedicated to specific uses, similar to manufactures of india rubber, other, and following Hensel, Bruckmann Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 212, C.D. 2498), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cust. Ct. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayco-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack