Dayco Co. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 830, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1269
United States Customs Court·Decided November 21, 1966·No. No. P66/342·Published

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of panels, sheets, and bars, made from and advanced beyond the stage of synthetic resin or resin-like products into finished panels, sheets, and bars, of specific sizes and shapes dedicated to specific uses, similar to and most resembling with respect to applicable use manufactures of india rubber, other, and following Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 212, C.D. 2498), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dayco Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 830, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1269 (cusc 1966).

57 Cust. Ct. 830 (Dayco Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 212 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)