Dayco Co. v. United States
This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 830 (Dayco Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of panels, sheets, and bars, made from and advanced beyond the stage of synthetic resin or resin-like products into finished panels, sheets, and bars, of specific sizes and shapes dedicated to specific uses, similar to and most resembling with respect to applicable use manufactures of india rubber, other, and following Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 212, C.D. 2498), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 Cust. Ct. 830, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayco-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.