Dayberry v. Ralston
This text of 84 F. App'x 726 (Dayberry v. Ralston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Glynetta Dayberry, personal representative of Justin Todd Dayberry, deceased, appeals the district court’s1 award of [727]*727$3,150 in attorney’s fees to the estate of deceased attorney Buddy Troxell, based on quantum meruit. After careful review, we conclude that the district court made no factual or legal mistakes, or any clear error of judgment in applying the relevant factors, and the award fell within the court’s range of discretion. See Pinfcham v. Camex, Inc., 84 F.3d 292, 294 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (standard of review); Pamida, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc., 281 F.3d 726, 729 (8th Cir.2002) (defining abuse-of-discretion standard).
Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayberry-v-ralston-ca8-2004.