Dayan v. Gelina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dayan v. Gelina

8 A.D.2d 939, 190 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7681

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 939 (Dayan v. Gelina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dayan v. Gelina, 8 A.D.2d 939, 190 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In a consolidated action (1) by the vendee named in a contract for the purchase and sale • of real property to recover the down payment and to impress a vendee’s lien, and (2) by the vendor named in said contract for the specific performance thereof, the appeal is (a) from an order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment striking out appellant’s answer and denying appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing respondent’s complaint, in the first above-mentioned action, and granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint and denying appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment striking out respondent’s answer, in the second above-mentioned action, and (b) from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present— Wenzel, Acting P. J„ Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, J.T.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a consolidated action (1) by the vendee named in a contract for the purchase and sale • of real property to recover the down payment and to impress a vendee’s lien, and (2) by the vendor named in said contract for the specific performance thereof, the appeal is (a) from an order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment striking out appellant’s answer and denying appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing respondent’s complaint, in the first above-mentioned action, and granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint and denying appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment striking out respondent’s answer, in the second above-mentioned action, and (b) from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present— Wenzel, Acting P. J„ Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, J.T.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 939, 190 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dayan-v-gelina-nyappdiv-1959.