Day v. Unknown
This text of Day v. Unknown (Day v. Unknown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division PAUL GORDON DAY, Petitioner, V. Civil Action No. 3:24CV847 UNKNOWN, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a letter. (ECF No. 1.) Given the content of this document, the Court found it was appropriate to give Petitioner the opportunity to pursue this action as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Rivenbark v. Virginia, 305 F. App’x 144, 145 (4th Cir. 2008). By Memorandum Order entered on December 6, 2024, the Court directed Petitioner, within twenty (20) days of the date of entry thereof, to complete and return the standardized form for filing a § 2241 petition if he wished to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court warned Petitioner that the failure to comply with the terms of the December 6, 2024 Memorandum Order would result in the dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than twenty (20) days have elapsed and Petitioner has not responded. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Final Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion
Rich li vn Richmond, Virginia Senior United State/Digirifi Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Day v. Unknown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-unknown-vaed-2025.