Day v. United States
This text of 31 F.2d 74 (Day v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the offense of carrying on the business of a wholesale liquor dealer. [75]*75The defendant was tried jointly with William Day under the indictment and the evidence referred to in the opinion filed herewith in the case of William Day v. United States, 31 F.(2d) 71. The alleged errors relied upon in this ease are the same as were urged in the appeal of William Day, and are not well taken for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, because the facts are substantially the same.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 F.2d 74, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-united-states-ca8-1929.