Day v. Thomas

82 A. 237, 25 Del. 488, 2 Boyce 488, 1911 Del. LEXIS 70
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedOctober 18, 1911
DocketNo. 35
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 82 A. 237 (Day v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Day v. Thomas, 82 A. 237, 25 Del. 488, 2 Boyce 488, 1911 Del. LEXIS 70 (Del. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Pennewill, C. J.

delivering the opinion of the court:

In the above-stated case a motion has been made that judgment be refused notwithstanding the affidavit filed by the plaintiff.

It appears from an examination of the alleged book account annexed to, and filed with, the affidavit, that the said account consists principally of charges for moneys advanced to the defendant.

We gather from the affidavit, and account, that the plaintiff advanced to the defendant, from time to timé, sums of money with which the defendant was to buy peaches for the plaintiff; that the aggregate amount so advanced exceeded the aggregate amount expended by the defendant, and that the excess is due and owing from the defendant to the plaintiff.

It is well settled that money advanced, or loaned, is not properly chargeable in a book account of original entries, ,and we, therefore, sustain the motion of the defendant that judgment be refused notwithstanding the affidavit filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Theo. Burton, Jr. & Co. v. Burks
188 A.2d 236 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1962)
Edsall v. Rockland Paper Co.
194 A. 115 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A. 237, 25 Del. 488, 2 Boyce 488, 1911 Del. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-thomas-delsuperct-1911.