Day v. State

257 S.W. 116, 96 Tex. Crim. 488
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Day v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 Tex. Crim. 117
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 19, 1923·No. No. 7975.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. The only contention made by appellant is that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. There is upon file what purports to be a statement of facts, which was carefully examined by us before discovering that the same is not agreed to by the attorneys, neither is it approved by the trial judge. In this condition it can not be considered and the case *489 must be treated as though no statement of facts were upon file. If the instrument on file contains the facts they appear sufficient to support the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Day v. State, 257 S.W. 116, 96 Tex. Crim. 488 (Tex. 1923).

257 S.W. 116 (Day v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.