Day v. State Tax Assessor
This text of 2008 ME 39 (Day v. State Tax Assessor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[¶ 1] James P. and Philomena T. Day and Gregory B. and Jayne D. Thornton (taxpayers), some of whom are members of a New Hampshire limited liability company, appeal from a judgment of the Superi- or Court (Kennebec County, Harden, J.) affirming the decision of the State Tax Assessor to deny the taxpayers a credit, pursuant to 86 M.R.S.A. § 5217-A (Supp. 2002), 1 against their Maine individual income taxes for taxes the LLC paid to New Hampshire under that state’s business profits tax. 2 The taxpayers argue that the court erred when it determined that plain readings of the relevant Maine and New Hampshire statutes support the decision of *686 the State Tax Assessor to deny the taxpayers a tax credit in Maine for business profits taxes paid to New Hampshire. Because the Court is evenly divided, we affirm the judgment. Hale v. Antoniou, 2008 ME 52, 820 A.2d 586.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
. Title 36 M.R.S.A. § 5217-A has since been amended. P.L. 2003, ch. 391, § 9 (effective Sept. 13, 2003) and P.L. 2003, ch. 673, § JJ-4 (effective July 30, 2004) (codified at 36 M.R.S. § 5217-A (2007)).
. See N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 77-A:2 (2003) (imposing tax "upon the taxable business profits of every business organization”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 ME 39, 942 A.2d 685, 2008 Me. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-state-tax-assessor-me-2008.