Day v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Day v. State

1913 OK CR 326, 133 P. 1195, 10 Okla. Crim. 637, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 275

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 12, 1913

DocketNo. A-1674.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 326 (Day v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Day v. State, 1913 OK CR 326, 133 P. 1195, 10 Okla. Crim. 637, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 275 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Harry Day, was convicted under an information which charged that Harry Da.y and Doc Beech did have the possession of intoxicating liquor with the intent to sell said liquor contrary to law. The record shows that only the defendant Day ap peared for trial. The jury returned a verdict finding the defendant Day guilty as charged and assessed his punishment at confinement for six months in the county jail, and that he pay a fine óf fifty dollars. On January 23, 1912, the judgment and sentence was entered in accord anee with the verdict. Upon a careful examination of the record our conclusion is that the assignments of error are not well taken. The guilt of the defendant was established beyond any reasonable doubt.. The judgment of the county court of Ofdahoma county is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Harry Day, was convicted under an information which charged that Harry Da.y and Doc Beech did have the possession of intoxicating liquor with the intent to sell said liquor contrary to law. The record shows that only the defendant Day ap peared for trial. The jury returned a verdict finding the defendant Day guilty as charged and assessed his punishment at confinement for six months in the county jail, and that he pay a fine óf fifty dollars. On January 23, 1912, the judgment and sentence was entered in accord anee with the verdict. Upon a careful examination of the record our conclusion is that the assignments of error are not well taken. The guilt of the defendant was established beyond any reasonable doubt.. The judgment of the county court of Ofdahoma county is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 326, 133 P. 1195, 10 Okla. Crim. 637, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.