Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Day v. State

Day v. State

146 S.E. 774, 39 Ga. App. 71, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 511
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 11, 1928·No. 19281·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in either of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. Tire evidence in this case is such as to bring it within the ruling in Yonce v. State, 154 Ga. 419 (114 S. E. 325), 29 Ga. App. 173 (114 S. E. 584) ; and the judge of the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke,'J., concur. J. P. Brooke, G. B. Walker, H. B. Moss, for plaintiff in error. George D. Anderson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Day v. State, 146 S.E. 774, 39 Ga. App. 71, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

146 S.E. 774 (Day v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yonce v. State
114 S.E. 325 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Yonce v. State
114 S.E. 584 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)