Day v. State

146 S.E. 774, 39 Ga. App. 71, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 511
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 11, 1928
Docket19281
StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E. 774 (Day v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Day v. State, 146 S.E. 774, 39 Ga. App. 71, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in either of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. Tire evidence in this case is such as to bring it within the ruling in Yonce v. State, 154 Ga. 419 (114 S. E. 325), 29 Ga. App. 173 (114 S. E. 584) ; and the judge of the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke,'J., concur. J. P. Brooke, G. B. Walker, H. B. Moss, for plaintiff in error. George D. Anderson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yonce v. State
114 S.E. 325 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Yonce v. State
114 S.E. 584 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 774, 39 Ga. App. 71, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-state-gactapp-1928.