Day v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Day v. State

385 S.E.2d 412, 259 Ga. 454

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 11, 1989·No. 46828·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore vacated.

All the Justices concur, except Smith, Gregory and Hunt, JJ., who dissent. [455]*455Decided September 11, 1989 Reconsideration denied October 4, 1989. William H. Mills, for appellant. Charles M. Ferguson, District Attorney, David H. Moseley, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore vacated.

All the Justices concur, except Smith, Gregory and Hunt, JJ., who dissent. [455]*455Decided September 11, 1989 Reconsideration denied October 4, 1989. William H. Mills, for appellant. Charles M. Ferguson, District Attorney, David H. Moseley, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Day v. State, 385 S.E.2d 412, 259 Ga. 454 (Ga. 1989).

Pincite

385 S.E.2d 412 (Day v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.