Day v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Day v. State

385 S.E.2d 412, 259 Ga. 454

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 11, 1989

Docket46828

StatusPublished

This text of 385 S.E.2d 412 (Day v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Day v. State, 385 S.E.2d 412, 259 Ga. 454 (Ga. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore vacated.

All the Justices concur, except Smith, Gregory and Hunt, JJ., who dissent. [455]*455Decided September 11, 1989 Reconsideration denied October 4, 1989. William H. Mills, for appellant. Charles M. Ferguson, District Attorney, David H. Moseley, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore vacated.

All the Justices concur, except Smith, Gregory and Hunt, JJ., who dissent. [455]*455Decided September 11, 1989 Reconsideration denied October 4, 1989. William H. Mills, for appellant. Charles M. Ferguson, District Attorney, David H. Moseley, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 S.E.2d 412, 259 Ga. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-state-ga-1989.