Day v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Day v. State

124 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 620

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 19, 1929

Docket4 Div. 560.

StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 920 (Day v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Day v. State, 124 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 620 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. -J.

At the fall term, 1927, of the Barbour circuit. court at Clayton, the grand jury returned an indictment against this appellant, charging the offense of violating the prohibition laws of the state by having in possession, etc., prohibited liquors. The trial was held, at the Spring term, 1929, of said court, which resulted in a conviction as charged, and the jury assessed a fine of $250 against the defendant. This appeal was taken from the judgment of conviction which followed the verdict of the jury. Confession of judgment for t,he fine and cost was had.

This' appeal is upon the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. . We have, as the law requires, examined the record, and have found it regular in all things, and therefore without error. Let the judgment of conviction in the lower court, as rendered, stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. -J.

At the fall term, 1927, of the Barbour circuit. court at Clayton, the grand jury returned an indictment against this appellant, charging the offense of violating the prohibition laws of the state by having in possession, etc., prohibited liquors. The trial was held, at the Spring term, 1929, of said court, which resulted in a conviction as charged, and the jury assessed a fine of $250 against the defendant. This appeal was taken from the judgment of conviction which followed the verdict of the jury. Confession of judgment for t,he fine and cost was had.

This' appeal is upon the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. . We have, as the law requires, examined the record, and have found it regular in all things, and therefore without error. Let the judgment of conviction in the lower court, as rendered, stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 So. 920, 23 Ala. App. 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-state-alactapp-1929.