Day v. SERVICE BLUEPRINT CO.

222 S.W.3d 283, 2007 WL 968628
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Day v. SERVICE BLUEPRINT CO.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 552
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 3, 2007·No. ED 88629·Published

Opinion

222 S.W.3d 283 (2007)

Marilyn DAY, Appellant,
v.
SERVICE BLUEPRINT COMPANY and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

No. ED 88629.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

April 3, 2007.
Application for Transfer Denied May 16, 2007.

Marilyn Day, Louis, MO, pro se.

Cynthia A. Quetsch, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before GLENN A NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.

Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 16, 2007.

ORDER

Marilyn Day appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Day v. SERVICE BLUEPRINT CO., 222 S.W.3d 283, 2007 WL 968628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

222 S.W.3d 283 (Day v. SERVICE BLUEPRINT CO.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Day v. Service Blueprint Co.
222 S.W.3d 283 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)