Day v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Day v. Secretary of Health and Human Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 Fed. Cl. 450
United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided March 31, 2017·No. 12-630·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-630V Filed: March 6, 2017

*********************** UNPUBLISHED BAILEY DAY * * Case No. 12-630 V Petitioner, * * v. * Chief Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages Award; Neuromyelitis AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Optica (“NMO”); Human Papilloma * Virus (“HPV”) Vaccine; Proffer. Respondent. * *********************** Anne Carrion Toale, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Gordon Elliot Shemin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On September 24, 2012, Laura Day filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”), 2 as the legal representative of her then- minor daughter, Bailey Day, in which she alleged that the Gardasil (“HPV”) and FluMist (“influenza”) vaccinations Bailey received on September 28, 2011, caused her to develop multiple sclerosis (“MS”). Petition at 3, ¶11. After the filing of the petition, it was discovered that Bailey actually suffers from a rare autoimmune disorder known as neuromyelitis optica (“NMO”) or Devic’s Syndrome, rather than MS. See Petitioner’s (“Pet’r’s”) Exhibit (“Ex.”) 6 at 13.

On November 13, 2015, the undersigned issued a decision finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation. During the time in which this case was being adjudicated, Bailey Day

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa.

1 turned 18 years old and was made the petitioner in her case. On May 31, 2016, the undersigned awarded Bailey interim damages for past pain and suffering in the amount of $250,000.00. 3

On March 3, 2017, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation (“Proffer”). In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner:

(1) A lump sum payment of $1,283,828.14, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($305,186.22), lost earnings ($968,386.45), and past unreimbursable expenses ($10,255.47), in the form of a check made payable to petitioner, Bailey Day.

(2) A lump sum payment in the amount of $7,584.74, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Indiana Medicaid lien, in the form of a check made payable to petitioner, Bailey Day and

Anthem BCBS, Inc. Attn: Anel Mendez 21555 Oxnard Street Mail Drop AC-10C Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Tax ID No. XX-XXXXXXX Policy No: IN0726491

(3) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in section II.C. of the Proffer.

Proffer at 5.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith. 4

3 Respondent filed a motion for review of this decision on June 30, 2016, and the decision was affirmed by Judge Wolski on December 7, 2017. The final judgment awarding interim damages was entered on January 18, 2017. Because petitioner has already received the maximum amount of pain and suffering damages permitted by the statute, pain and suffering damages are not awarded in this decision. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) BAILEY DAY, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 12-630V ) Chief Special Master Dorsey v. ) ECF ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, CNLP, and petitioner

engaged Tresa Johnson, RN, BSN, CLCP, to provide an estimation of Bailey Day’s future

vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related” is as

described in the Chief Special Master’s Ruling on Entitlement, filed November 13, 2015. All

items of compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are

illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Bailey Day, attached

hereto as Tab A. 1 Respondent proffers that Bailey Day should be awarded all items of

compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A.

Petitioner agrees.

1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment.

-1- B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Bailey Day has suffered past

loss of earnings and will suffer a loss of earnings in the future. Therefore, respondent proffers

that Bailey Day should be awarded lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. §

300aa-15(a)(3)(B). Respondent proffers that the appropriate award for Bailey Day’s lost

earnings is $968,386.45. Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

On May 31, 2016, the Chief Special Master issued a decision awarding compensation on

an interim basis, awarding pain and suffering in the amount of $250,000.00. An amended

judgment for this component of damages entered on January 18, 2017. This item of

compensation has been paid. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner is not entitled to any

additional compensation for pain and suffering under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable

expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be

awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $10,255.47. Petitioner agrees.

E. Medicaid Lien

Respondent proffers that Bailey Day should be awarded funds to satisfy a State of

Indiana lien in the amount of $7,584.74, which represents full satisfaction of any right of

subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Indiana may have against any

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Day v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2017).

Day v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Day v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a