Day v. Providence Hospital, Inc.

D.C. Circuit

Day v. Providence Hospital, Inc.

266 F.2d 689

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 16, 1959·No. Nos. 14564, 14565·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from judgments of the District Court in a medical malpractice case, directing verdicts for defendants-appellees at the close of the evidence. We find no error affecting substantial rights. In particular, we note that there was no adequate showing by the plaintiff that the allegedly negligent conduct on the part of appellees was the cause of the condition from which plaintiff now suffers. Cf. Kasmer v. Sternal, 1948, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 50, 165 F.2d 624; Hall v. United States, D.C.1955, 136 F.Supp. 187, affirmed, 5 Cir., 1956, 234 F.2d 811; Ayers v. Parry, 3 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 181, certiorari denied, 1952, 343 U.S. 980, 72 S.Ct. 1081, 96 L.Ed. 1371.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from judgments of the District Court in a medical malpractice case, directing verdicts for defendants-appellees at the close of the evidence. We find no error affecting substantial rights. In particular, we note that there was no adequate showing by the plaintiff that the allegedly negligent conduct on the part of appellees was the cause of the condition from which plaintiff now suffers. Cf. Kasmer v. Sternal, 1948, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 50, 165 F.2d 624; Hall v. United States, D.C.1955, 136 F.Supp. 187, affirmed, 5 Cir., 1956, 234 F.2d 811; Ayers v. Parry, 3 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 181, certiorari denied, 1952, 343 U.S. 980, 72 S.Ct. 1081, 96 L.Ed. 1371.

Affirmed.

Day v. Providence Hospital, Inc., 266 F.2d 689 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

266 F.2d 689 (Day v. Providence Hospital, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related