Day v. Providence Hospital, Inc.
This text of 266 F.2d 689 (Day v. Providence Hospital, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These are appeals from judgments of the District Court in a medical malpractice case, directing verdicts for defendants-appellees at the close of the evidence. We find no error affecting substantial rights. In particular, we note that there was no adequate showing by the plaintiff that the allegedly negligent conduct on the part of appellees was the cause of the condition from which plaintiff now suffers. Cf. Kasmer v. Sternal, 1948, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 50, 165 F.2d 624; Hall v. United States, D.C.1955, 136 F.Supp. 187, affirmed, 5 Cir., 1956, 234 F.2d 811; Ayers v. Parry, 3 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 181, certiorari denied, 1952, 343 U.S. 980, 72 S.Ct. 1081, 96 L.Ed. 1371.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 F.2d 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-providence-hospital-inc-cadc-1959.