Day v. Kansas City Pipe Line Co.
109 P. 186, 82 Kan. 861, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 364
Opinion
This is an action to cancel an oil-and-gas lease. It is claimed that the action can not be maintained for the reason that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law. The facts are sufficiently similar to the Howerton case to make it controlling here. This case is therefore reversed upon the authority of Howerton v. Gas Co., decided upon rehearing, ante, p. 367.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Day v. Kansas City Pipe Line Co., 109 P. 186, 82 Kan. 861, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 364 (kan 1910).
109 P. 186 (Day v. Kansas City Pipe Line Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Sauder
67 F.2d 9 (Tenth Circuit, 1933)
Day v. Kansas City Pipe Line Co.
125 P. 43 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1912)