Day v. Haskell
This text of 2011 ND 125 (Day v. Haskell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/24/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2011 ND 123
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Phillip James Seewalker, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20100201
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Pamela A. Nesvig, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5518, Bismarck, ND 58506-5518, for plaintiff and appellee.
Robert W. Martin, North Dakota Public Defenders’ Office, 11 1st Ave. SW, Minot, ND 58701, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Seewalker
[¶1] Philip James Seewalker appealed a criminal judgment and order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Seewalker argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Allan L. Schmalenberger, S. J.
[¶3] The Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, S. J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 ND 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-haskell-nd-2011.