Day v. Flournoy
This text of 34 Tex. 439 (Day v. Flournoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the commencement of this suit the Constitution of 1845 was in force. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace, and the amount involved was less than one hundred dollars.
Article four, section ten, of the Constitution limited the ori- ' ginal jurisdiction of the district court to one hundred dollars and upwards. The only mode by which this case could have been taken to the district court was by the writ of certiorari. (See O’Brien v. Dunn, 5 Texas, 570.)
The record does not show that the case was taken to the district court on certiorari in the manner pointed out by law. •
[440]*440The agreement of parties to waive what the law required to be done, could give the court no jurisdiction.
The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Tex. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-flournoy-tex-1871.