Day v. Florida Insurance Guaranty

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Day v. Florida Insurance Guaranty

358 So. 2d 602, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15586

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 12, 1978

DocketNo. 77-1431

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 358 So. 2d 602 (Day v. Florida Insurance Guaranty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Day v. Florida Insurance Guaranty, 358 So. 2d 602, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Day seeks to appeal an order which states “the Defendant, Florida Insurance Guaranty Association’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment be and the same is hereby granted.” This is not a final decision, order, judgment or decree within the contemplation of Fla.R.App.P. 3.2(b). Likewise, this case is not one which formerly would have been cognizable in equity so the order is not subject to an interlocutory appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 4.2(a).

Therefore, we have no jurisdiction, and this appeal is hereby dismissed sua sponte. Rizzuto v. DiPaolo, 357 So.2d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA, opinion filed Apr. 19, 1978); Arnold v. Brady, 178 So.2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Day seeks to appeal an order which states “the Defendant, Florida Insurance Guaranty Association’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment be and the same is hereby granted.” This is not a final decision, order, judgment or decree within the contemplation of Fla.R.App.P. 3.2(b). Likewise, this case is not one which formerly would have been cognizable in equity so the order is not subject to an interlocutory appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 4.2(a).

Therefore, we have no jurisdiction, and this appeal is hereby dismissed sua sponte. Rizzuto v. DiPaolo, 357 So.2d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA, opinion filed Apr. 19, 1978); Arnold v. Brady, 178 So.2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 So. 2d 602, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-florida-insurance-guaranty-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack