Day v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company
138 N.E. 481, 234 N.Y. 646, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 829
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
• Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Absent: Crane, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Day v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company, 138 N.E. 481, 234 N.Y. 646, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 829 (N.Y. 1923).
138 N.E. 481 (Day v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.