Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska
This text of 83 F.3d 1040 (Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Victor Day appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in Day’s civil rights action. Day v. Board of Regents, 911 F.Supp. 1228 (D.Neb.1995). Day contends the University of Nebraska’s decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived him of an array of constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief. Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 F.3d 1040, 1996 WL 271616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-board-of-regents-of-the-university-of-nebraska-ca8-1996.