Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska

Eighth Circuit

Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska

83 F.3d 1040, 1996 WL 271616

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 22, 1996·No. No. 95-4073NE·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Victor Day appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in Day’s civil rights action. Day v. Board of Regents, 911 F.Supp. 1228 (D.Neb.1995). Day contends the University of Nebraska’s decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived him of an array of constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief. Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Victor Day appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in Day’s civil rights action. Day v. Board of Regents, 911 F.Supp. 1228 (D.Neb.1995). Day contends the University of Nebraska’s decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived him of an array of constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief. Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, 83 F.3d 1040, 1996 WL 271616 (8th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

83 F.3d 1040 (Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related