Day v. Bank of Sparks

101 S.E. 715, 24 Ga. App. 628, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 974
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 16, 1919·No. 10893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

The affidavit of illegality in this case contained all the material allegations required by law, and therefore the court erred in dismissing it.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. Story & Story, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Park’s Cgde, §§ 5305-7, 5311, and annotations.

TF. R. Smith, contra,

cited: 59 Ga. 467; 14 Ga. App. 790; 15 Ga. App. 162; 49 Ga. 579; 55 Ga. 677; 101 Ga. 763; 63 Ga. 481-3; 99 Ga. 145.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Day v. Bank of Sparks, 101 S.E. 715, 24 Ga. App. 628, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 974 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

101 S.E. 715 (Day v. Bank of Sparks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Day v. Bank of Sparks
107 S.E. 272 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)