Day v. Bank of Sparks
101 S.E. 715, 24 Ga. App. 628, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 974
Opinion
The affidavit of illegality in this case contained all the material allegations required by law, and therefore the court erred in dismissing it.
Judgment reversed.
cited: Park’s Cgde, §§ 5305-7, 5311, and annotations.
cited: 59 Ga. 467; 14 Ga. App. 790; 15 Ga. App. 162; 49 Ga. 579; 55 Ga. 677; 101 Ga. 763; 63 Ga. 481-3; 99 Ga. 145.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Day v. Bank of Sparks, 101 S.E. 715, 24 Ga. App. 628, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 974 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
101 S.E. 715 (Day v. Bank of Sparks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Day v. Bank of Sparks
107 S.E. 272 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)