Dawson v. Winter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dawson v. Winter. Read the opinion of the Court — 277 F. App'x 297
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 12, 2008·No. 07-1575·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1575

JACK A. DAWSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy; VICE ADMIRAL RODNEY P. REMPT, Superintendent United States Naval Academy,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-02885-CCB)

Submitted: April 23, 2008 Decided: May 12, 2008

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald G. Dawson, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jack A. Dawson appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to defendants on his complaint that

sought to invalidate his obligation to reimburse the government.

We have thoroughly reviewed the briefs and the materials submitted

by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dawson v.

Winter, No. 1:06-cv-02885-CCB (D. Md. May 21, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dawson v. Winter, (4th Cir. 2008).

Dawson v. Winter (Dawson v. Winter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.