Home/Supreme Court/Dawson v. United States

Dawson v. United States

478 U.S. 1031, 107 S. Ct. 11, 92 L. Ed. 2d 766, 55 U.S.L.W. 3152, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2780
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedAugust 19, 1986
DocketNo. A-940 (85-7002)
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 478 U.S. 1031 (Dawson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dawson v. United States, 478 U.S. 1031, 107 S. Ct. 11, 92 L. Ed. 2d 766, 55 U.S.L.W. 3152, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2780 (1986).

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Application for bail, addressed to Justice Stevens and referred to the Court, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canal Insurance Co. v. Haniewski, No. 417942 (Jul. 3, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 8868 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
United States of America, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Park B. Banks, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant
115 F.3d 916 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Banks
Eleventh Circuit, 1997
Hart v. Posey
31 Va. Cir. 284 (Stafford County Circuit Court, 1993)
Weisfeld v. Peterseil School Corp.
623 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
COLSON ON BEHALF OF COLSON v. Sillman
852 F. Supp. 1183 (W.D. New York, 1992)
United States v. Eastern of New Jersey, Inc.
770 F. Supp. 964 (D. New Jersey, 1991)
Moore v. Goode
375 S.E.2d 549 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1988)
Lamadrid v. Hegstrom
830 F.2d 1524 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Eufemia Lamadrid, for Herself and as Next Friend for Her Minor Son, Joey Lamadrid Debbie Viskov, Jeremy Gerber, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Leo Hegstrom, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Director, Department of Human Resources of the State of Oregon and Keith Putnam, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Adult and Family Services Division of the State of Oregon, and Margaret Heckler, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of United States Department of Health & Human Services, Shirley Streahl v. Leo Hegstrom, and Margaret Heckler, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Carole C. White, Mary Halverson, and Irma Diaz, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Karen Rahm, Secretary, Department of Social & Health Services, Defendant
830 F.2d 1524 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
478 U.S. 1031, 107 S. Ct. 11, 92 L. Ed. 2d 766, 55 U.S.L.W. 3152, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-united-states-scotus-1986.