Dawson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dawson v. State

338 S.W.3d 862, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 480, 2011 WL 1362690

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 12, 2011·No. WD 71994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Jermain Dawson appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal published opinion; however a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Jermain Dawson appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal published opinion; however a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Dawson v. State, 338 S.W.3d 862, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 480, 2011 WL 1362690 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

338 S.W.3d 862 (Dawson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.