Dawson v. State

66 So. 3d 1077, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12388, 2011 WL 3464716
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 2011·No. No. 1D10-1943·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Keith Dawson appeals his convictions for dealing in stolen property and false verification of ownership on a pawnbroker transaction form. He contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the inference arising from selling property below fair market value. The instruction given accurately states the law, but there is no evidence in the record [1078]*1078of the fair market value. We are compelled by our prior decision in a nearly identical case to find that this was error. See, Barfield v. State, 613 So.2d 507, 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Because we are unable to say the error was harmless, we reverse.

REVERSED.

PADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dawson v. State, 66 So. 3d 1077, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12388, 2011 WL 3464716 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

66 So. 3d 1077 (Dawson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeudy v. State
209 So. 3d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)