Dawson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dawson v. State

776 So. 2d 1034, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 801, 2001 WL 76942

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 2001

DocketNo. 4D00-571

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 776 So. 2d 1034 (Dawson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dawson v. State, 776 So. 2d 1034, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 801, 2001 WL 76942 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

SHAHOOD, J.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. See Singer v. State, 647 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); see also Wilkerson v. State, 556 So.2d 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). The second issue raised has been rendered moot by the trial court’s entry of an Order Rescinding Probation.

We write only to address an issue which was not raised on appeal, but requires our attention. The judgment in this case incorrectly states that appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere in this case. The judgment and sentence in this case were entered pursuant to a jury verdict. We sua sponte remand to the trial court to enter a corrected judgment and sentence. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED TO ENTER CORRECTED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI