Dawson v. State

750 So. 2d 728, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 479, 2000 WL 60229
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2000·No. Nos. 3D99-196, 3D99-177·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, defendants who were tried together appeal from judgments of conviction for armed robbery. We affirm.

“It is well settled in Florida that a person may be identified as the perpetrator of a crime solely by means of voice recognition.” Weinshenker v. State, 223 So.2d 561, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). This is particularly true when, as in this case, the facial features of the assailant are covered by a mask. See State v. Fischer, 387 So.2d 473, 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Here, the victims testified that they recognized the masked defendants’ voices because the defendants frequented the store and were known to the victims.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dawson v. State, 750 So. 2d 728, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 479, 2000 WL 60229 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

750 So. 2d 728 (Dawson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weinshenker v. State
223 So. 2d 561 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
State v. Fischer
387 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)