Dawson v. . Speight

Superior Court of North Carolina

Dawson v. . Speight

1 N.C. 231

DecidedJuly 5, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 231 (Dawson v. . Speight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dawson v. . Speight, 1 N.C. 231 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

If a commission be taken out in blank, the party may fill it up, and afterwards, if occasion require it, strike out the commissioner's name; but if the clerk fill up the commission, his act is that of the Court, and the party may not strike out the name of the commissioner and insert another.

Answer set aside.

* * * The "Observations on the Act of 1715, ch. 27, with a view to ascertain its proper construction," are to be found in 5 N.C. 22, in note b, to the case of Stanley v. Turner, and are therefore omitted here. *Page 201

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

If a commission be taken out in blank, the party may fill it up, and afterwards, if occasion require it, strike out the commissioner's name; but if the clerk fill up the commission, his act is that of the Court, and the party may not strike out the name of the commissioner and insert another.

Answer set aside.

* * * The "Observations on the Act of 1715, ch. 27, with a view to ascertain its proper construction," are to be found in 5 N.C. 22, in note b, to the case of Stanley v. Turner, and are therefore omitted here. *Page 201

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-speight-ncsuperct-1802.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack