Dawson v. Shinseki
This text of Dawson v. Shinseki (Dawson v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-7125
LARRY C. DAWSON,
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
Respondent-Appellee.
William F. Fox, Purcell & Fox, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for claimant-appellant. Of counsel on the brief was Robert W. Legg, Law Office of Robert W. Legg, of Arlington, Virginia.
Meredyth Cohen Havasy, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. On the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director, and L. Misha Preheim, Attorney. Of counsel on the brief were David J. Barrans, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Dana Raffaelli, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Judge Bruce E. Kasold NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-7125
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
in CASE NO(S). 07-2752
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (GAJARSA, ARCHER and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED March 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dawson v. Shinseki, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-shinseki-cafc-2010.