Dawson v. Parsons
21 N.Y.S. 212, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 916
Opinion
We think that these orders should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned justice at special, term. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.
PUTNAM, J.-, concurs. HERRICK, J., not acting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dawson v. Parsons, 21 N.Y.S. 212, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 916 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
21 N.Y.S. 212 (Dawson v. Parsons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mosher v. Lount
240 P. 1027 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1925)