Dawson v. Nelson
This text of 661 P.2d 683 (Dawson v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner-appellant, William Dawson, appeals the Arapahoe County district court’s discharge of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court discharged the writ because the warrant and supporting documents substantially charged the petitioner with the crime of murder in California. On appeal, the petitioner claims that extradition should be denied because he was detained for longer than 30 days after his arrest, in violation of section 16-19-116, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8).1 We affirm the district court’s discharge of the petition.
The petitioner was arrested in Arapahoe County on March 11, 1982, based on a report that listed the vehicle he was driving as stolen. He appeared in court on April 15, 1982, 35 days later. Colorado authorities served the petitioner with the Colorado [684]*684governor’s warrant on or about May 13, 1982. The petitioner filed a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus on May 14, 1982. The district court discharged the writ on May 20, 1982.
The petitioner contends on appeal that his detention contravenes the mandate of section 16-19-116 that a fugitive awaiting requisition documents be committed to the county jail “for such a time not exceeding thirty days.” For the reasons stated in our opinion in Casler v. Nelson, 661 P.2d 1166 (Colo.1983) we find the petitioner’s argument to be without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
661 P.2d 683, 1983 Colo. LEXIS 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-nelson-colo-1983.