Dawson v. Naphcare Inc

Opinion

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE

8 RUSSEL H. DAWSON, Personal CASE NO. C19-1987RSM 9 Representative of the Estate of Damaris Rodriguez, et al., ORDER DENYING STIPULATED 10 MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 SOUTH CORRECTIONAL ENTITY 13 (“SCORE”), a Governmental Administrative Agency, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation and Proposed Order 16 Resetting Trial and Associated Filing Dates. Dkt. #198. The parties request a three-month 17 continuance of the trial date, from November 29, 2021, to February 22, 2022. Id. The 18 stipulation does not include any reason for this request. An earlier email from counsel to the 19 Court’s in-court deputy clerk inquired about dates in February and mentioned the parties’ need 20 for rulings on pending motions to help prepare for trial. 21 A scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” 22 Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The decision to modify a scheduling order is within the broad 23 discretion of the district court. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th 24 1 Cir. 1992). “Rule 16(b)’s ‘good cause’ standard primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking amendment.” Id. at 609. If a party has acted diligently yet still cannot reasonably meet 2 the scheduling deadlines, the court may allow modification of the schedule. Id. Local Civil Rule 3 16(m) states that “this rule will be strictly enforced” in order to “accomplish effective pretrial 4 procedures and avoid wasting the time of the parties, counsel, and the court.” 5 The Court finds that the parties have failed to demonstrate good cause for their request. 6 Good cause must be included in the Motion and cannot be communicated solely via email. 7 Accordingly, the Court will deny this Motion and encourages parties to re-file. 8 Having reviewed the relevant briefing and the remainder of the record, the Court hereby 9 finds and ORDERS that the parties’ Stipulation and Proposed Order Resetting Trial and 10 Associated Filing Dates, Dkt. #198, is DENIED. 11 DATED this 21st day of September, 2021. 12 13 A 14 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 15 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24