Dawson v. Heid Bros.

94 S.W.2d 201, 1936 Tex. App. LEXIS 487
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 23, 1936
DocketNo. 3370.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 S.W.2d 201 (Dawson v. Heid Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dawson v. Heid Bros., 94 S.W.2d 201, 1936 Tex. App. LEXIS 487 (Tex. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

WALTHALL, Justice.

This is an attempted appeal from an. interlocutory order of the county court at law of El Paso county appointing a receiver. In the absence of a statute authorizing the same, an appeal will not lie from an interlocutory order. Article 2250, *202 R.S., authorizes an appeal from an interlocutory order of the district court appointing a receiver. By its terms the right of appeal is limited to such orders of the district court. Accordingly, this appeal should be dismissed. Muela v. Moye (Tex.Civ.App.) 185 S.W. 331.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davenport v. Wood Motor Co.
107 S.W.2d 1093 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.W.2d 201, 1936 Tex. App. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-heid-bros-texapp-1936.