Dawson v. English
This text of 69 S.E. 1133 (Dawson v. English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The headnote states sufficient of the facts. The present case is distinguished from Burch v. Pedigo, 113 Ga. 1157 (39 S. E. 493, 54 L. R. A. 808), by the fact that in that case only [586]*586the note (i. e., the evidence of the indebtedness alone) was transferred, as well as by the fact that the transfer in that case was made prior to the passage of the act of 1899. It is distinguished from Swann Davis Co. v. Stanton, 7 Ga. App. 668 (67 S. E. 888), by the fact that in that case there'was no written transfer at all.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 S.E. 1133, 8 Ga. App. 585, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-english-gactapp-1911.