Dawson v. English
69 S.E. 1133, 8 Ga. App. 585, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 64
Opinion
The headnote states sufficient of the facts. The present case is distinguished from Burch v. Pedigo, 113 Ga. 1157 (39 S. E. 493, 54 L. R. A. 808), by the fact that in that case only [586]*586the note (i. e., the evidence of the indebtedness alone) was transferred, as well as by the fact that the transfer in that case was made prior to the passage of the act of 1899. It is distinguished from Swann Davis Co. v. Stanton, 7 Ga. App. 668 (67 S. E. 888), by the fact that in that case there'was no written transfer at all.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dawson v. English, 69 S.E. 1133, 8 Ga. App. 585, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 64 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
69 S.E. 1133 (Dawson v. English) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adel Banking Co. v. Parrish
66 S.E.2d 150 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Broach & Co. v. David
87 S.E. 696 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Blakely Artesian Ice Co. v. Clarke
79 S.E. 526 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
West Yellow Pine Co. v. Kendrick
71 S.E. 504 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)