Dawson v. Crossen
This text of 10 Or. 41 (Dawson v. Crossen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
Where McO., by a deed of general assignment, duly executed and acknowledged, conveyed all his property to D. in [42]*42trust, for tlie benefit of all his creditors in proportion to the amount of their respective claims, and delivered the possession of said property to D., hut prior to the recording of said deed of assignment, and before an inventory had been filed as required by the act of 1878, C., a sheriff, seized said property under a writ of attachment duly issued, etc., and took the property from tlie possession of D., who thereupon commenced this action to recover tlie same; Held, That the recording of a deed of assignment is not essential to its validity where possession accompanies the conveyance of personal property, or where an actual transfer of the property assigned takes place; Held, further, That the failure of an assignee to file an inventory for record does not render the assignment void, and that D., the assignee, is entitled to the possession of the property.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Or. 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-crossen-or-1881.