Dawson v. Cartledge

Fourth Circuit

Dawson v. Cartledge

631 F. App'x 145

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 2016

DocketNo. 15-7420

StatusPublished

This text of 631 F. App'x 145 (Dawson v. Cartledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dawson v. Cartledge, 631 F. App'x 145 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Douglas Dawson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dawson v. Cartledge, No. 4:14-cv-03259-DCN, 2015 WL 5092617 (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Douglas Dawson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dawson v. Cartledge, No. 4:14-cv-03259-DCN, 2015 WL 5092617 (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

631 F. App'x 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-cartledge-ca4-2016.