Dawson v. Board of Civil Service Commrs.

California Court of Appeal

Dawson v. Board of Civil Service Commrs.

30 P.2d 608, 137 Cal. App. 414

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 19, 1934

DocketDocket No. 9313.

StatusPublished

This text of 30 P.2d 608 (Dawson v. Board of Civil Service Commrs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dawson v. Board of Civil Service Commrs., 30 P.2d 608, 137 Cal. App. 414 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

This is a companion case to Jenkins v. Board of CivilService Commission, (Civil No. 9356) ante, p. 410 [30 P.2d 606], the opinion in which last-named case has been this day filed. *Page 415 [1] The pleadings, evidence, findings, judgments and briefs in the two cases are practically the same. Plaintiff herein was employed as a carpenter foreman in charge of the construction work on substation No. 4. Plaintiff's employment was terminated at the time of the termination of the employment of the plaintiff in the Jenkins case. The construction work on said substation upon which plaintiff was engaged had been completed at that time and there was but one other substation still under construction. The evidence herein regarding lack of work and lack of funds amply supports the findings on these issues and the trial court properly denied the writ.

The judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, P.J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a companion case to Jenkins v. Board of CivilService Commission, (Civil No. 9356) ante, p. 410 [30 P.2d 606], the opinion in which last-named case has been this day filed. *Page 415 [1] The pleadings, evidence, findings, judgments and briefs in the two cases are practically the same. Plaintiff herein was employed as a carpenter foreman in charge of the construction work on substation No. 4. Plaintiff's employment was terminated at the time of the termination of the employment of the plaintiff in the Jenkins case. The construction work on said substation upon which plaintiff was engaged had been completed at that time and there was but one other substation still under construction. The evidence herein regarding lack of work and lack of funds amply supports the findings on these issues and the trial court properly denied the writ.

The judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, P.J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 P.2d 608, 137 Cal. App. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-board-of-civil-service-commrs-calctapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack