Dawson v. Belleque
This text of Dawson v. Belleque (Dawson v. Belleque) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 22 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON, No. 07-36033
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-06-00012-CMK
v. ORDER BRIAN BELLEQUE, Oregon State Penitentiary,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Garr M. King, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 2, 2010 Portland, Oregon
Before: W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and BURY, District Judge.*
We construe this appeal as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(3) to file a
second or successive petition for habeas corpus. As jointly requested by the
* The Honorable David C. Bury, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. parties, we grant the motion. We direct the district court to allow Petitioner Craig
Dawson to file his Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. As
jointly agreed by the parties, the district court shall consider the merits of
Petitioner’s Ex Post Facto claim. As jointly agreed by the parties, Superintendent
Belleque shall waive all of his procedural defenses in the district court. Finally, as
jointly agreed by the parties, each party shall bear his own costs and fees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dawson v. Belleque, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dawson-v-belleque-ca9-2011.